CMNS 130 (article review)

WRITE AN ARTICLE REVIEW WRITE AN ARTICLE REVIEW IN NORMAL VOCABULARY AND STRUCTURE IN WRITING AND DO NOT USE OUTSIDE MATERIAL IN THIS REVIEW. ONLY FROM THE ARTICLE. Review the ideas presented by the author. Indicate your level of agreement or disagreement. Are these ideas relevant today? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments presented? The goal of this assignment is for you to critically assess the ideas advanced by the authors using your own knowledge and experience to justify your position. Requirements: very good explanation | .doc file The critique should include an introductory paragraph briefly summarizing the article and a concluding paragraph briefly summarizing the student’s position on the value/accuracy/relevance of the article The report must be 850 – 1000 words report (excludes Cover page and References) All materials must be referenced using APA style. Suggested structure of the assignment: Introduction Main Body (divide this work into sections and name each section) and Conclusion. It should be free of spelling errors be grammatically correct and written in full sentences. PLEASE HAVE A LOOK AT THIS ALSO Paragraph 1 – Introduction – Introduce the reading (author title general contents) – Provide a brief summary + your analysis (opinion) of the article – What is the main point of this article and why is it important? –PARAGRAPH 2 -Research Problem and Hypothesis – 2-3 key terms from the article – Research problem and objective – Hypothesis or Research Question – Your analysis – did the authors do a good job? Why or why not? PARAGRAPH -3 Research Design + Procedure – Research methods (surveys interviews observation experiment etc.) – Object (general group or media product or practice) and sample (specific participants in study) – Your analysis – did the authors do a good job? Why or why not? PARAGRAPH 4– Results Analysis and Conclusion – main results – Form of data analysis (how do the authors sort the information and make conclusions? ex. statistics) – Discussion – do the authors suggest any areas for improvement or further research? – Conclusion – Your analysis – did the authors do a good job? Why or why not? PARAGRAPH–5 Analysis Summary – How well did the author(s) accomplish their original objectives? Refer to the strengths and weaknesses of the research. – Do you agree or disagree with any of the other points in the article? – Do you have any questions or suggestions about what could have been done differently in the study? – What new information could be collected or what other studies could be conducted that are related to this topic? PARAGRAPH-6 Conclusion – Briefly summarize what the authors accomplished with their research study – will the article be useful to you or others? – Restate your positive and negative evaluation of the research and the research article. REFERENCES Write the APA Citation for your article below the heading “References” – Be sure to use a hanging indent