Guidance for writing up Unit 3 psych report – Models of memory section
Section 1: AC 1.1 – 1.2 – roughly 2000 – 2100 words. (All together 3000 words)
Outline each of the three models of memory (approx 500 – 700 words per model – does not have to be an even split):
o Describe (briefly) key structures/processes (SM, STM, LTM)
o Briefly explain how model works & it’s main claims (3 separate, unitary stores, emphasis on rehearsal)
o Use evidence to illustrate/support (eg, studies showing differences between stores, eg, capacity, duration, encoding)
o Evaluate using evidence, eg, Clive Wearing – shows multiple LTM stores, so cannot be unitary; flashbulb memories don’t require rehearsal; LTM used in STM tasks
o Overly simplistic; doesn’t explain how different types of info might be processed, eg, visual/acoustic (see WMM); provides good foundation for other models/research; chunking useful technique.
o Link to MSM – challenges notion of unitary, passive STM
o Describe each component (briefly)
o Provide evidence to support model & illustrate components, eg, dual-tasking, articulatory suppression tasks, evidence for central executive
o Evaluate using evidence, eg, EVR good with reasoning, bad with decision-making, so more than one central executive? Reliance on case studies (unique – not generalisable); brain damaged patients – no before/after comparison, brain trauma may influence performance; doesn’t really explain processes; but has good application, eg, dyslexia; advancement over STM
o Link to previous models – agrees that memory is active (like WMM), but disagrees with structural models; challenges the MSM’s reliance on maintenance rehearsal
o Offers alternative view – memory as by-product of processing (therefore long/short-term retention, rather than long/short-term memory stores)
o Explain levels – shallow vs deep processing
o Illustrate using evidence, eg, Hyde & Jenkins, Perfetti & Elias, Palmere, et al.
o Evaluate – no independent measurement of depth – eg, Tyler – depth vs effort; circularity of argument; criticism by Eysenck that model only describes what’s happening, but recent studies explain that elaborative rehearsal enriches memory by linking it into pre-existing network of semantic association.
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more