“What factors can positively and negatively impact the planning and execution in use of Business Information System of an organisation? Define these factors and explain how the organisation can use information technology as a tool to do essential business tasks such as utilizing documents, presentations, spreadsheets, as well as using the web to find information to create web pages.”
Research essay by going to library, online, books, news, articles, write a piece of articles base on this.
Valuable information must be accessible and relevant (There are 10 characteristics for any information to be consider valuable to organization. Pick some of this as main bottle or sub title)
Assessment Requirements:
-Plagiarism: 10% and below
-Abstract / Executive Summary & Introduction can be combine if want. And Introduction, body and conclusion is a must.
-Conclusion should tie up with what was mention in executive summary
-The report needs to consist of Headings and Sub-headings where appropriate,
At least 5-6 referencing is a must, best is to have 10. Reference must be citied in the report.
| High Distinction (HD)
80-100% |
Distinction (D)
70-79% |
Credit (C)
60-69% |
Pass (P)
50-59% |
Fail (F)
<50% |
|
| Knowledge | · Outstanding Subject knowledge
· Effectively introduces and integrates knowledge from independent study beyond scope of module materials · Draws links to other modules · No further development of answer required |
· Uses a wide range of ideas and concepts from the module
· Draws different concepts together effectively · Strong use of relevant theoretical models and/or research · Fully referenced with wide range of sources · Strong evidence of independent research to enhance the answer |
· Draws together key ideas and concepts from the module effectively
· Some use of theoretical models and/or research to support answer · Evidence of some independent research but largely guided by references provided in the module |
· Uses some relevant ideas and concepts from the module
· Limited gaps in knowledge or misunderstanding of concepts · Some relevant references but may be overreliance on core textbooks/overuse of direct quotes etc. |
· No/ very limited use of ideas and concepts from the module to answer the question
· No/very limited supporting literature |
| Critical Thinking | · Extensive critical evaluation of arguments and referenced research and literature | · Researched and answered from different angles.
· Considers the limitations of some of the research sources used |
· Strong development of advantages/disadvant ages, pros and cons etc. evident in answer
· May be some evidence different approaches to answering the question are understood |
· Acknowledges some alternative interpretations to the answer e.g. advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons | · A one sided answer with no consideration of alternative viewpoints. |
| Application | · Thoughtful and thorough application of knowledge, theory
and research to case |
· Tailors information to answer the question fully | · Illustrates answer with some appropriate organisational | · Examples are very limited or lack relevance | · No or inappropriate use of examples
· No links to case study organisation |
| High Distinction (HD)
80-100% |
Distinction (D)
70-79% |
Credit (C)
60-69% |
Pass (P)
50-59% |
Fail (F)
<50% |
|
| study throughout
analysis and recommendations |
· Illustrates answer with
range of organisational examples · Links relevant personal examples/experiences to appropriate theoretical concepts and literature · Applies concepts thoroughly to case study organisation |
examples discussed
during the module · Uses personal examples but may not always link this back to theoretical concepts and literature · Links to case study but integration with theory/research may still be disjointed in places |
· Case study is
mentioned but poorly integrated into the answer |
||
| Evaluation | · All concepts and material fully relevant to the analysis and recommendations including materials sourced from independent research | · Answers the question fully covering all key concepts
· No evidence of ‘padding’ with irrelevant information |
· Chooses appropriate concepts and makes a clear attempt to answer the question
· Information is mostly relevant to the question · Only minor missing elements · Minimal ‘padding’ with irrelevant information |
· Some effort to answer the question
· Some missing or weak elements · Covers some relevant concepts but links to answer are unclear in places · Important concepts may be difficult to extract from other irrelevant information |
· Does not answer the question that was asked
· Covers concepts which are not relevant to the answer. |
| High Distinction (HD)
80-100% |
Distinction (D)
70-79% |
Credit (C)
60-69% |
Pass (P)
50-59% |
Fail (F)
<50% |
|
| Organization and
Language |
· Outstanding,
sophisticated written communication · No significant areas for further development |
· Logical organisation
and flow of ideas · Error free written communication · Precise Harvard Referencing · An enjoyable read |
· Well-structured
answer · Only minor spelling/grammatical errors · Good grasp of Harvard Referencing · Mainly easy to read and follow |
· Some
spelling/grammatical errors but do not significantly interfere with understanding · Some attempt to Harvard Reference · Difficult to read and follow in places |
· Very difficult to read
and follow · Extensive problems with written presentation · No or incorrect Referencing |
| Referencing and Citations | · Sources are exceptionally well- integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively.
· Quotations and works cited conform international standards (APA/MLA ) |
· Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims.
· There may be occasional errors, but the sources and works cited conform to international standards (APA/MLA) |
· Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well
within the paper’s argument. · There may be a few errors in citing. |
· Sources support a few claims in the paper, but are not integrated well within the paper’s argument.
· There may be multiple errors in citing. |
· The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well.
· They are not cited correctly according to international standards. |
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreThe Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.
Read moreThe Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.
Read moreThe Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.
Read moreBy placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.
Read more