6/22/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=386598&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=6574&d2l_b… 1/2
Close
Print Rubric
SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) – Version 1.2
Course: MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01
/ 40
Response
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-27)
27 points
Satisfactory (C: 28-31)
31 points
Proficient (B: 32-35)
35 points
Exemplary (A: 36-40)
40 points
Criterion Score
Quality of Initial
Posting
No initial posting exists to
evaluate.
The information provided is
inaccurate, not focused on
the assignment’s topic,
and/or does not answer the
question(s) fully. Response
demonstrates incomplete
understanding of the topic
and/or inadequate
preparation.
The information provided is
accurate, giving a basic
understanding of the topic(s)
covered. A basic
understanding is when you
are able to describe the
terms and concepts covered.
Despite this basic
understanding, initial posting
may not include complete
development of all aspects of
the assignment.
The information provided is
accurate, displaying a good
understanding of the topic(s)
covered. A good
understanding is when you
are able to explain the terms
and topics covered. Initial
posting demonstrates sincere
reflection and addresses
most aspects of the
assignment, although all
concepts may not be fully
developed.
The information provided is
accurate, providing an in-
depth, well thought-out
understanding of the topic(s)
covered. An in-depth
understanding provides an
analysis of the information,
synthesizing what is learned
from the course/assigned
readings.
/ 20
Participation
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14-16)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Participation in
Discussion
No responses to other
classmates were posted in
this discussion forum.
May include one or more of
the following:
*Comments to only one other
student’s post.
*Comments are not
substantive, such as just one
line or saying, “Good job” or
“I agree.
*Comments are off topic.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts but
only on one day of the week.
Comments are substantive,
meaning they reflect and
expand on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts on
more than one day.
Comments are substantive,
meaning they reflect and
expand on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two or more
classmates’ initial posts and
to the instructor’s comment
(if applicable) on two or more
days. Responses demonstrate
an analysis of peers’
comments, building on
previous posts. Comments
extend and deepen
meaningful conversation and
may include a follow-up
question.
6/22/2021 Rubric Assessment – MHC6305-Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations SU01 – South University
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=78100&evalObjectId=386598&evalObjectType=5&userId=4901&groupId=0&rubricId=6574&d2l_b… 2/2
Total / 80
Overall Score
/ 20
Writing
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14-16)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion ScoreWriting
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1-13)
13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14-16)
16 points
Proficient (B: 17-18)
18 points
Exemplary (A: 19-20)
20 points
Criterion Score
Writing Mechanics
(Spelling, Grammar,
Citation Style) and
Information
Literacy
No postings for which to
evaluate language and
grammar exist.
Numerous issues in any of
the following: grammar,
mechanics, spelling, use of
slang, and incomplete or
missing citations and
references. If required for the
assignment, did not use
course, text, and/or outside
readings (where relevant) to
support work.
Some spelling, grammatical,
and/or structural errors are
present. Some errors in
formatting citations and
references are present. If
required for the assignment,
utilizes sources to support
work for initial post but not
comments to other students.
Sources include course/text
readings but outside sources
(when relevant) include non-
academic/authoritative, such
as Wikis and .com resources.
Minor errors in grammar,
mechanics, or spelling in the
initial posting are present.
Minor errors in formatting
citations and references may
exist. If required for the
assignment, utilizes sources
to support work for both the
initial post and some of the
comments to other students.
Sources include course and
text readings as well as
outside sources (when
relevant) that are academic
and authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles, other text
books, .gov Web sites,
professional organization
Web sites, cases, statutes, or
administrative rules).
Minor to no errors exist in
grammar, mechanics, or
spelling in both the initial
post and comments to
others. Formatting of
citations and references is
correct. If required for the
assignment, utilizes sources
to support work for both the
initial post and the comments
to other students. Sources
include course and text
readings as well as outside
sources (when relevant) that
are academic and
authoritative (e.g., journal
articles, other text books,
.gov Web sites, professional
organization Web sites,
cases, statutes, or
administrative rules).
No Submission
0 points minimum
There was no submission
for this assignment.
Emerging (F to D Range)
1 point minimum
Satisfactory progress has not been met on the
competencies for this assignment.
Satisfactory (C Range)
56 points minimum
Satisfactory progress has been achieved on
the competencies for this assignment.
Proficient (B Range)
64 points minimum
Proficiency has been achieved on the
competencies for this assignment.
Exemplary (A Range)
72 points minimum
The competencies for this
assignment have been mastered.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more