ASSIGNMENT: Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.
A. TOPIC SELECTION GUIDELINES
DIRECTIONS: You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
Keep in mind: The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
Keep in mind: Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
|Advanced (90-100%)||Proficient (80-89%)||Acceptable (70-79%)||Needs Improvement (50-69%)||Non-Performance (0-49%)|
Pose a meaningful research question on a debatable topic.
|Constructs a precise and focused research question relative to a current and debatable topic.||Constructs a focused research question relative to a debatable topic.||Constructs a research question relative to a debatable topic; however it is somewhat too broad or too narrow for the assignment.||Constructs a research question; however, the question is too broad or too narrow for the assignment and/or it is not debatable.||Does not construct a research question, or constructs a research question that does not meet any of the rubric criteria.|
Propose a focused working thesis.
|Includes a working thesis that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of an issue.||Includes a working thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an issue.||Includes a working thesis that takes a clear position on one side of an issue; however it lacks specificity.||Includes a working thesis; however, it lacks specificity and does not take a clear position.||Does not include a working thesis, or includes a thesis that does not take a position.|
Present a detailed outline that includes coherent headings, subheadings, and source placement notes.
|Outline is thoroughly developed and clearly labeled with effective notes, such that the reader can easily see how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.||Outline is well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.||Outline is primarily well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get an overall sense of how the essay will build its argument; however, a few necessary elements may be unclear or missing.||Outline is not fully developed and/or labeling and notes are often unclear, such that the reader cannot easily get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; several necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing.||Outline is not developed and/or labeling and notes are unclear or absent, such that the reader is unable to see how the essay will build its argument; most necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing.|
Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.
|Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.||Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.||Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.||Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.||Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.|
Follow conventions for standard written English.
|There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.||There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.||There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.||There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.||There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.|
Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.
|Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.||Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.||Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.||Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.||No reflection responses are present.|
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
Requirements: .doc file
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more