Organizational Behavior assignment

General Instructions for Homework Assignments: Clarification: This Case Incident is housed in Chapter 7. You do not need Chapter 7 knowledge to complete this case. Rather this is grouped with the Chapter 9 module because I would like for you to have a frame of reference for topics related to fairness in pay when we discuss the fairness theories in Chapter 7 soon. Instructions: Read Case Incident 1: The Demotivation of CEO Pay (pp. 245-246 of your textbook) and respond to the below questions. The below questions are not exactly the same questions asked in the book so be sure you are answering the below questions. Note: This is an individual assignment and must not be worked on/discussed with others. 1. What do you think is the ideal ratio for CEO to worker compensation? Discuss. [20 points] 2. (a) How does the executive compensation issue relate to equity theory? Discuss. [10 points] Note: You can skip this question component. Everyone will receive full credit on this question component since we have gotten a bit behind and have not yet discussed equity theory.(b) How should we determine what is a “fair” level of pay for top executives (for example what factors should be considered?)? Discuss. [10 points] 3. The study discussed in the case found that participants thought performance should be essential or very important in deciding executive pay. Do you agree? Discuss why or why not. [20 points] 4. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) maintains information on CEO pay. Click here to view the highest-paid CEOs (you can also search for a particular CEO): Link (Links to an external site.) (URL: https://aflcio.org/paywatch/highest-paid-ceos (Links to an external site.)). You can also view company pay ratios: Link (Links to an external site.) (URL: https://aflcio.org/paywatch/company-pay-ratios (Links to an external site.)). Choose a company or CEO you are interested in. For (a) through (d) you do not have to respond in complete sentences. An example answer is provided in terms of Elon Musk with Tesla Inc. You cannot use this example to answer the question. (a) What is the company (just provide the company name)? example: Tesla Inc. [7 points](b) Who is the CEO (just provide the CEOs name)? example: Elon Musk [7 points](c) What is the CEOs total CEO pay for 2018 (2019 if that is what is provided) (just provide the total CEO pay)? example: $2284044844 [7 points](d) How much of that CEOs total pay is specifically salary (take-home pay) (just provide the CEOs actual salary)? To find this information you will need to click on the hyperlink for the company. example: $56380 [7 points](e) Did the information you found surprise you? Discuss why or why not. [12 points] Previous Answer each question and question component thoroughly and using complete sentences and proper grammar to receive full credit. Use the numbering scheme provided in your responses to clearly indicate to which question you are responding. All information needed to respond comes from your textbook readings lecture and in some circumstances information provided in the assignment itself. Unless otherwise noted do not consult outside resources to shape your answers. Answer questions using only the material you read in the chapter learned in lecture read in the assignment and your personal knowledge/experience/opinions. I want to know your thoughts and ideas. Evidence of the use of outside sources beyond the approved sources will result in a zero on the assignment. Turnitin is enabled for this assignment. An explanation of how responses are graded is provided at the bottom of this page. Grade DeterminationThe starting point value associated with each question component is provided in brackets after the question component. Grading anchors for each question component are as follows:full credit (100%): Very thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (90%): Thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (80%): Somewhat thorough in-depth discussion reflecting moderate critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (70%): Minimally thorough discussion; answers question but reflects little critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (60%): Surface-level discussion; no depth to response/discussion reflecting very little critical thinking; answers the question askedno credit (0%): Does not answer the question askedDeductions to starting score:Use of outside sources: automatic zeroNot writing in complete sentences: 10-point deduction per occurrenceGrammatical/typographical errors:0-2: no deduction3-5: 10-point deductionmore than 6: 30-point deduction The starting point value associated with each question component is provided in brackets after the question component. Grading anchors for each question component are as follows:full credit (100%): Very thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (90%): Thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (80%): Somewhat thorough in-depth discussion reflecting moderate critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (70%): Minimally thorough discussion; answers question but reflects little critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question askedpartial credit (60%): Surface-level discussion; no depth to response/discussion reflecting very little critical thinking; answers the question askedno credit (0%): Does not answer the question asked full credit (100%): Very thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked partial credit (90%): Thorough in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked partial credit (80%): Somewhat thorough in-depth discussion reflecting moderate critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked partial credit (70%): Minimally thorough discussion; answers question but reflects little critical thinking (requires at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked partial credit (60%): Surface-level discussion; no depth to response/discussion reflecting very little critical thinking; answers the question asked no credit (0%): Does not answer the question asked Deductions to starting score:Use of outside sources: automatic zeroNot writing in complete sentences: 10-point deduction per occurrenceGrammatical/typographical errors:0-2: no deduction3-5: 10-point deductionmore than 6: 30-point deduction Use of outside sources: automatic zero Not writing in complete sentences: 10-point deduction per occurrence Grammatical/typographical errors:0-2: no deduction3-5: 10-point deductionmore than 6: 30-point deduction 0-2: no deduction 3-5: 10-point deduction more than 6: 30-point deduction