Social Media Campaign Plan for Vaccinations in Cedar Park

1. Community Health Nursing Diagnostic Statement

Parents and elderly citizens in Cedar Park, Texas, who require vaccinations for their children or themselves are still at risk. The main causes identified are preconceptions concerning vaccinations and insufficient centres for administering vaccinations. The evidence available through vaccination data obtained from the local health department of Cedar Park reveals that overall vaccinations are slightly low compared to those of the state and the entire nation, pointing out a major health disparity (Oyedele et al., 2019). This has led to a lack of vaccination exercises essential for human life due to challenges such as lack of funds and health facilities, further hindering the problem. For this reason, it is almost impossible to elude this concern in a bid to help vulnerable persons from contracting diseases, which, in one way or another,, can be prevented, to improve the health and well-being of society. Some steps need to be taken to remind people about the flu and the vaccines, to give accurate and credible information about the vaccines, and to facilitate people’s access to vaccination services to increase the immunization rate in Cedar Park.

B1. Health Inequity or Disparity

A key issue in the health inequity of Cedar Park involves poverty and low vaccination among families of low-income and minorities.  These populations encounter multiple challenges, such as Sanitation and other health services, economic factors, and misconceptions about vaccines.  Other challenges patients face include Healthcare misinformation and the lack of trust in the healthcare system, which also worsens these issues (Sundstrom et al., 2021).  Thus, the pockets of poor and ethnic minorities are at higher risk of succumbing to vaccine-preventable diseases, which is something we should be concerned about in public health.  Culturally marginalized groups still cannot find up-to-date information about needed immunization and qualify for appropriate healthcare, which makes them susceptible to disease outbreaks, usually caused by vaccine-preventable illnesses (Baum et al., 2019).  In order to target these disparities, there must be an effort towards enhancing physical access to health care, increasing the availability of correct vaccine information, and strengthening the trust of the people of these communities.  It is pertinent that all residents of Cedar Park have equal opportunity to be protected from such diseases, which is why urging vaccination equity is crucial for the overall population health and disease disparity elimination.

B1a. Primary Community and Prevention Resources

In Cedar Park, some of the existing resources that could be used to help boost the low vaccination rates include local health clinics that offer vaccines, school-based health programs, and community centres that occasionally come up with vaccination crusades.  These help create accessible spaces within residents that can be used for vaccination and creating awareness of health.  Moreover, primary prevention materials support clients in the vaccination process.  Since new vaccines are being developed and distributed by public health departments, there is a need to have myths broken and accurate knowledge imparted (Baum et al., 2019).  CDC has useful tools such as guides and products promoting these campaigns.  There are also needed actions on free and easily accessible vaccinations to address financial constraints for less privileged citizens and gain access to immunizations.  Altogether, these community and primary prevention resources help raise the vaccination level, decrease adverse impacts on the population’s health, and limit occurrences of VPDs in Cedar Park (Syafril & Hadziq, 2021).  By so doing, the community targets the highest immunization coverage and improvement of the health status of the community.

B1b. Underlying Causes

Social factors that influence vaccination coverage in Cedar Park include the socio-economic status of the people, educational status, cultural beliefs, and ability to access health facilities.  The living standard is significantly inversely proportional to the health and educational promotional techniques, which leads to lower vaccination rates (Duong et al., 2023).  Furthermore, knowledge about peoples’ cultural backgrounds may also play a role in shaping the organizational culture towards vaccination.  Other factors include the accessibility to healthcare services and means, the restrictions on citizens’ mobility and the scarcity of healthcare amenities that prevent residents from obtaining vaccinations.

The problems exhibited by the material include several root causes.  Some causes include forging fake vaccine information that circulates on social media and other forms of communication.  Apart from having no access to vaccines or facilities offered, financial expenses like the cost of vaccines or immunization-related healthcare services also deter low-income families from getting vaccinated.  Transport is also a problem in the COVID vaccination because people who do not have their means of transport are likely to find it difficult to travel to the vaccination stations (Yang et al., 2023).  Finally, a lack of understanding of the written language, especially for those vaccines where information must be read, leads to reduced trust in the healthcare providers and conveyance of the vaccines.  Undoubtedly, intervention in the causative factors is critical to increasing vaccine coverage and the health of society as a whole.

B2. Evidence-Based Practice

Utilizing evidence-based interventions can significantly address low vaccination rates in Cedar Park.  Community outreach programs can educate residents about the benefits and safety of vaccines, combating misinformation.  Educational workshops, particularly those held in local schools and community centres, provide opportunities for face-to-face interactions where healthcare professionals can answer questions.  Mobile vaccination units are another effective intervention, bringing vaccines directly to underserved neighbourhoods, thus overcoming barriers such as transportation and accessibility.  According to Cedar Park Health Department reports, the vaccination rate for children aged 5-17 is approximately 72%, below the state average (Adella & Rukmini, 2021).  Attempts to raise this rate have been made by local health fairs and school-based polio vaccination campaigns; however, more work needs to be done due to continuously emerging misconceptions and organizational issues.

The Texas Department of State Health Services has revealed that a % of children in the state’s populations had received one or more doses of childhood vaccines at 80% hence, this implies that Cedar Park has been left behind in regards to the state trends as stated by Ghouri et al. (2020). Many efforts have been undertaken by the state department to reduce the number of people who do not get vaccinated. These include Health department collaborations and other advertisements. The survey data obtained from NS-CHS also evidenced that the percentage of children aged 19-35 months who received a final dose of MMR is roughly 90% (Bakhurji et al., 2023). The variation presented in Cedar Park’s vaccination rates justifies scales at the national level and brings awareness to the critical issues that require further prevention at the community level. These data prove that interventions promoting vaccinations among patients in Cedar Park should be based on best practices. Education on such diseases as Hepatitis through workshops, community contact, and van vaccination can help the community get even closer to attaining state and nationwide vaccination goals.

1. Community Health Nursing Social Media Campaign Strategy

C1. Social Media Campaign Objective

Objective: Increase vaccination rates in Cedar Park by 20% within one year through targeted social media interventions.

C2. Social Marketing Interventions

It is also necessary to initiate a Facebook advertising post based on actual interviews with residents and healthcare workers about the necessity of getting vaccinated. Sharing their tales with residents and other trusted professional members of the community ensures that the message is real and inspiring (Vyas et al., 2020). These testimonials can, therefore, play a central role in the campaign to reduce vaccine hesitancy because people are more likely to be convinced by the success stories of other identifiable members of society.

Create short animated infographics and videos on Instagram that help debunk these vaccine myths.  There is also a greater appeal, especially among young people who are always on social media and, more preferably, Instagram.  Sharing facts and figures via information graphics and short, engaging clips is the best way to overcome misconceptions and myths about the vaccine (Vyas et al., 2020).  This approach uses the platform to its advantage, guaranteeing that the dissemination of accurate information concerning the campaign happens in a way that can be easily understood and shared further, hence increasing the reach and effectiveness of the campaign.

C3. Social Media Platforms

The two selected platforms that will be used are Fakebook and Instagram.  The vaccination campaign can greatly benefit from using Facebook and Instagram as both services are popular with a broad audience and especially active for persons in Cedar Park.  Facebook offers a detailed setup and an opportunity to interact with colleagues, which makes this resource suitable for sharing detailed testimonials and discussions (Harding et al., 2020).  Readily shareable, Instagram is ideal for disseminating brief chunks of time-sensitive information and using graphics and videos, especially preferred by youth.  This is because both platforms will spread the health message widely, making the campaign cover all the grounds and ultimately helping to increase vaccination.

C3a. Benefits of Social Media Platform

Facebook is good for lengthy content and detailed posts, as well as sharing a large availability and creating groups and events.  These features help make it a useful approach to reaching out to a lot of people and initiating a conversation on the need to take vaccinations (Ummar et al., 2023).  It is highly engaging, especially with visual content, has active users among the younger population and is suitable for spreading information and news in the stories and the posts section.  It remains suitable for sharing enveloping, captivating infographics and videos to debunk myths surrounding valuable immunization and the propagation of accurate knowledge.

C4. Benefit to the Target Population

This social media approach will remarkably positively impact the target population since it will increase their standards of knowledge and concern over immunization.  This self-awareness is expected to translate into improved immunizations, and as such, Cedar Park will record a low prevalence of vaccine-preventable illnesses.  Since the campaign will offer the right information to the people to discount misinformation and myths that prevail among the residents, the public will be in a position to make the right health choices (Arli & Dietrich, 2017).  In the long term, these outcomes will help to prevent and reduce the incidence of highly contagious diseases in society and promote well-being, well-being and quality of life in society, especially for the young and the elderly.

1. Best Practices for Implementing Social Media Tools for Health Marketing

Some guidelines that can be followed when utilizing social media tools include Health marketing: Organizing health on social media tools involves observing the following guidelines.  First, proper updating should be done to ensure the audience gets updated information that will continue to interest them.  This can include new testimonials, patients’ feedback, new clinic changes, and new infographics on vaccinations (Buller et al., 2021).  Commenting on any user’s post, especially on the brand’s posts, directly replying to them creates trust and addresses user issues.  Such bidirectional communication benefits in portraying instances of misuse and creating a healthy community.  Hence it is advisable to incorporate in our messages multimedia such as videos, pictures or any form of graphical content to make the message presentation more attractive to our target group as well as popular format to ladies, ensuring that our messages have a higher tendency of being well retained.

The thorough management of the collected feedback and the appropriate handling of this feedback at a particular time is also another factor that enhances the credibility of the concerned medium and fosters the ability to adjust and respond to the audience’s feedback if need be. This necessity implies that the campaign should not only be more dynamic but also be more carefully tailored to the target population group. Furthermore, targeting audiences who are leaders within the local community, including influencers, influential citizens, and medical professionals, may expand the campaign’s outreach and garner more support (Fazio et al., 2023). It entails employing personalities with a large following as a method of enhancing the given message since they act like endorsers of that particular message, apart from engaging the health care providers – the message is more credible to them.When implemented in unison, these steps make for a comprehensive, all-encompassing, and effective social media health marketing campaign that gets the message out to the community about myths surrounding the vaccine and the need to avail the same.

1. Social Media Campaign Implementation Plan

E1. Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities

Health departments in local areas are responsible for disseminating vaccine details and materials.  School administrators will provide contact information to students and parents, thereby bringing young families into the campaign.  Some of the known benefits attributed to the campaign are highlighted below. Some of the known benefits attributed to the campaign include Community leaders playing a central role in endorsing the campaign to gain support from the entire community (Rajput et al., 2022).  In these communities, healthcare providers share their insights and advice, thus increasing the reliability of the information provided and answering questions of a medical nature.  These stakeholders collectively represent informational and social support systems to the campaign’s aims and objectives of enhancing vaccinations in Cedar Park.

E2. Potential Partnerships

Public partnerships refer to associating with local government departments of health, which are important stakeholders in the vaccination campaign.  This means these agencies can assist in providing data, making outreach, or providing the mechanisms required for a successful campaign.  Local businesses and non-profit actors may donate funds and resources and contribute to vaccination campaigns and events (Argyris et al., 2023).  These organizations can offer financial sponsorship, campaign advertising space outlets for holding campaign events and other structures that only serve to improve the overall scope of the campaign.  By collaborating with public and private organizations, strong support has been developed for a suitable implementation in Cedar Park and high immunisation rates with fewer adverse effects.

E3. Implementation Timeline

Vaccination in the context of the timeline commences with Months 1-2, during which the primary activities will be planning and content development.  In this phase, stakeholders, including the local health departments, school administrators and leaders, and healthcare providers, come up with comprehensive material and plans.  The first six months of the campaign are as follows: The preliminary marketing and advertisement campaigns are initiated in Months 3-6 through social networking site participation and events organization.  This is the phase where the activity is, push out or call out for engagement.  Months 7-12 involve constant content updates and checking the progress while making the necessary changes to fit the campaign to the community to continue receiving positive feedback.

E4. Evaluation of Effectiveness

Surveys could be used to capture the community’s feedback for the vaccination campaign. At the same time, social media engagement metrics could also be used to gauge the level of engagement required in the vaccination campaign.  Finally, the number of vaccinations administered for the particular campaign could also be used to evaluate the campaign.  The measures for reliability involve increased social media interactions, which means that the campaign is creating awareness among the targeted demographical groups, positive comments and feedback from the community members as a way through which one can establish that the community members appreciated this campaign and that the campaign did educate the community on the importance of vaccination; therefore, those successes are an indication that this campaign worked (Rajput et al., 2022).  Altogether, these tools and criteria may enable the different stakeholders to evaluate the campaign’s effectiveness and conclude on the expected results in other areas.

E5. Cost of Implementation

The following are the potential costs which are incurred when putting in place the social media campaign to lure people to Cedar Park for vaccination.  Initially, content creation is inherently costly, implying that high-quality videos, graphic content, and articles must be produced to explain why vaccinations are vital convincingly.  This includes hiring graphic designers, photographers, and content writers to create professional content.  Expenses incurred through the use of social networks like Facebook for advertising are another cost factor.  Commercial breaks are especially important since they would contribute to the campaign’s chances of penetrating as many people within Cedar Park as possible and those who fall under a given category.  These will increase visibility and attention towards these billboards and reinforce the message of this campaign.

Another crucial expense within the community event budget is the event expenses.  Strategies such as mobilization of the target population for vaccination, carrying out of educational activities, and awareness-creating activities normally come with costs such as hiring of halls or venues, procuring of materials to be used, printing of fliers, having to offer some encouragement or incentives to the targeted people possibly.  The costs categorized for the initial installation and continuous expenses are estimated to be approximately $5000.  This budget is for purchasing the initial content, the price of the first social media advertisements, and the beginning of community activities.  Sustaining costs will entail frequent updates of content to be posted, advertising expenditures to sustain the public’s interest, and expenditures to be incurred in organizing more participative corporations and events on the importance of immunizations.  This all-inclusive budget enables the perpetration of the campaign within the prepared period and with optimum impact.

1. Reflection on Social Media Marketing

Social media marketing presents many advantages for public health campaigns, especially in terms of its ability to increase the audience and interactivity.  Facebook and Instagram are some platforms that enable campaigns to reach out to a bigger populace and, therefore, ensure that health messages are passed as effectively as required.  The freedom of using social media also implies real-time feedback, meaning that the campaign organizers can immediately respond to issues raised, counter some of the myths circulating around and even shape the message according to the needs of the particular community.  This mutual interdependence creates awareness and a sense of responsibility among the people, hence creating more commitment and trust towards the causes of health problems.

In subsequent practice, the use of social media can be extended to promote several other campaigns on health aside from vaccination exercises.  For instance, campaigns such as non-communicable diseases, mental illness, and healthy living also seek to spread information. They can incorporate fun and timely content that is shared through different platforms.  Social media is effective in its strategy by giving the target population relevant campaigns to help reach them.  Additionally, the means of influencers and active community members of the platforms can increase the spread and believability of health advancements.

Through the use of social media to engage the community, it will be possible to teach people the importance of health regularly.  To keep the public in touch with the latest information about health, preventive measures, and care, healthcare facilities must update their content frequently and be active on the platform.  This continued collaboration is crucial in ensuring that the community is well-informed and, hence, empowered to make knowledgeable decisions regarding their health.

References

Adella, & Rukmini, E. (2021). Healthy diet social media campaign among Indonesian college students.  International Journal of Public Health Science, 10(3).  https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v10i3.20842

Argyris, Y. A., Nelson, V. R., Wiseley, K., Shen, R., & Roscizewski, A. (2023).  Do social media campaigns foster vaccination adherence?  A systematic review of prior intervention-based campaigns on social media.  In Telematics and Informatics (Vol. 76).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101918

Arli, D., & Dietrich, T. (2017). Can Social Media Campaigns Backfire?  Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes and Word-of-Mouth Toward Four Social Media Campaigns and Its Implications on Consumer-Campaign Identification.  Journal of Promotion Management, 23(6).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2017.1323259

Bakhurji, E. A., M. Alqahtani, A., M. Alwashmi, E., S. Husain, M., & Gaffar, B. O. (2023). The effect of social media campaigns on parental knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the use of children’s car seats in the Gulf region.  BMC Public Health, 23(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16742-0

Baum, D., Spann, M., Füller, J., & Thürridl, C. (2019). The impact of social media campaigns on the success of new product introductions.  Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.003

Buller, D. B., Pagoto, S., Baker, K., Walkosz, B. J., Hillhouse, J., Henry, K. L., Berteletti, J., & Bibeau, J. (2021). Results of a social media campaign to prevent teen indoor tanning: A randomized controlled trial.  Preventive Medicine Reports, 22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101382

Duong, H. T., Nguyen, L. T. Van, Julian McFarlane, S., Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, K. T. (2023).  Preventing the COVID-19 Outbreak in Vietnam: Social Media Campaign Exposure and the Role of Interpersonal Communication.  Health Communication, 38(2).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1953729

Fazio, A., Reggiani, T., & Scervini, F. (2023). Social media charity campaigns and pro-social behaviour.  Evidence from the Ice Bucket Challenge.  Journal of Economic Psychology, 96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2023.102624

Ghouri, A. M., Akhtar, P., Vachkova, M., Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A. K., & Palihawadana, D. (2020).  Emancipatory Ethical Social Media Campaigns: Fostering Relationship Harmony and Peace.  Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04279-5

Harding, K., Aryeetey, R., Carroll, G., Lasisi, O., Pérez-Escamilla, R., & Young, M. (2020). Breastfeed4Ghana: Design and evaluation of an innovative social media campaign.  Maternal and Child Nutrition, 16(2).  https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12909

Oyedele, A., Hernandez, M. D., & Backes, K. (2019).  Consumer Culture and Political Ideology Plots in Social Media Campaigns.  Journal of Promotion Management, 25(1).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2018.1427655

Rajput, S., Dash, G., Upamannyu, N., Sharma, B. K., & Singh, P. (2022). Social media campaigns and domestic products consumption: a study on an emerging economy.  In Cogent Business and Management (Vol. 9, Issue 1).  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2143018

Sundstrom, B., Cartmell, K. B., White, A. A., Well, H., Pierce, J. Y., & Brandt, H. M. (2021). Correcting HPV vaccination misinformation online: Evaluating the HPV vaccination NOW social media campaign.  Vaccines, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040352

Syafril, S., & Hadziq, M. F. (2021). Islamic Principles in Marketing: An Overview of Islamic Marketing Mix in Social-Media Campaign.  El-Qish: Journal of Islamic Economics, 1(1).  https://doi.org/10.33830/elqish.v1i1.1568.2021

Ummar, R., Shaheen, K., Bashir, I., Ul Haq, J., & Bonn, M. A. (2023).  Green Social Media Campaigns: Influencing Consumers’ Attitudes and Behaviors.  Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712932

Vyas, A. N., Nagaraj, N., Genovese, J., Malhotra, G., Dubey, N., Hingorani, R., & Manning, L. (2020).  The Girl Rising ‘We Dream, We Rise’ Social Media Campaign in India: Reach, Engagement and Impact.  Journal of Creative Communications, 15(1).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258619878354

Yang, S., Tao, R., Bhattar, M., Shen, L., Jones, M., Garbacz, A., & Passmore, S. R. (2023).  Designing and testing social media campaign messages to promote COVID-19 vaccine confidence among rural adults: A community-engaged approach featuring rural community leader and clinician testimonials.  Preventive Medicine Reports, p. 36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102508