The Post-COVID-19 Economy:
The Case for the “V”
April 2020
Economy White Paper Series
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
2
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
2
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
Overview: Is Hysteria the New Normal?
The good news is that the number of new, confirmed cases of Coronavirus in the United States has, at least for now,
peaked and appears to be falling. Stay-at-home mandates across the nation have been having their intended effect
of limiting the spread of the virus beyond the initial surge. We are far less cognizant, however, of what the full scope
of the economic shock will be, as economic statistics significantly lag public health stats. There is some data for
March, but much of the month had passed before public health closures were widely mandated; hence they don’t
tell us much. April numbers won’t start arriving until early May.
Regardless, there is little doubt that these health mandated closures will cause a record decline in economic activity
in the second quarter of the year. How much of a guessing game is a wild guessing game right now as there is no
historical precedent for the current crisis and little good data as of yet. Current estimates from a variety of forecasting
organizations suggest second quarter growth could run from -20% to -40%, and we don’t disagree. Those numbers,
however, sound far worse than they are as economists have a habit of reporting GDP statistics in annualized form. This
means that the total output of the economy will contract by -5% to -10% from the first to the second quarter. Still, this is
larger than anything experienced in the past.
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
3
The real debate is over what comes next. As always, the issue has been boiled down to a spelling bee: will it be a “V”
recovery or a “U”? Or perhaps a “W” and for the true pessimist let’s not forget the dreaded “L”. The broad consensus
appears to be “U”— meaning that there will be little bounce following the record second quarter downturn, after which
we’ll have a long painful climb back to normality. Under this scenario, unemployment will remain elevated well into 2021
if not beyond. Most of the “U” camp is suggesting a business cycle that is as large or larger than what transpired during
the Great Recession.
The problem with these forecasts is that they are leaping to extremely grim conclusions with little basis. While there are
many anecdotes and grim news stories—not to mention the universally odd experience of closed schools and empty
highways—there is very little hard data yet. And we don’t have any recent economic experiences within the developed
world to use as a historical metaphor. All forecasts right now are, at some level, a leap in the dark. But very few seem to
acknowledge this even as they put out extremely negative predictions.
Rather than pretend there is any logical way of building a mathematical model to predict trends in the coming months,
in the outlook below, we boil the question of how this business cycle will look into five basic questions that should
determine how rapidly the economy can bounce back after what will surely be a record second quarter decline. Even
cursory answers to these questions suggest that while a “U” is certainly possible, it is actually a far less likely outcome.
There is little reason to think the economy can’t and won’t, bounce back rapidly—possibly even so rapidly as to call
into question whether this entire episode can be accurately described as a recession as opposed to a national natural
disaster.
So why have the bulk of outlooks gone so negative? In truth, it is a relatively typical reaction. In January 2019 the stock
markets were down 20% and the majority of contributors to the Wall Street Journal’s ‘Next Recession’ consensus survey
were predicting a recession within 12 months. Why? The real estate collapse, rising inflation, rising interest rates, and of
course the trade war with China, which was going to do incredible damage to the U.S. manufacturing sector. Of course,
none of this came close to occurring. By April the markets were yet again hitting record high levels. Obviously, the
impacts of today’s public health mandates are substantially more severe than what was happening back then—but the
level of hysteria has simply risen proportionately. This kind of reaction is, unfortunately, the new normal.
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
4
THIS IS NOT THE GREAT RECESSION
The one data point that really stands out is the 26 million initial claims for unemployment insurance filed over the five
weeks since the mandated shutdowns went national. In all of 2008 (the Great Recession) there were 22 million initial
claims filed. Never has the nation had so many people out of work and never has it happened so quickly. Worse yet,
historical patterns on unemployment rates are clear: once up they take a long time to fall again. This naturally leads to
the conclusion that this downturn will be worse than the last one.
But there is no similarity to what is happening today and what happened in the lead up to the Great Recession, or to any
recessions in the last sixty years or more, if ever. This means we can’t necessarily use past patterns as a lens to predict
the path ahead.
The Great Recession was driven by a collapse of the massive subprime credit bubble, which formed during the preceding
years and which pumped $15 trillion in new financial and household debt into the economy. This enormous credit inflow
highly overinflated consumer borrowing, and the housing and commercial real estate industries. Easy credit pushed
consumer savings rates to the lowest on record while the resulting consumption binge opened the widest trade deficit
in decades.
Total Claims for Unemployment
Trailing 12 Months
40000
20000
25000
5000
0
35000
15000
30000
10000
Ja
n
-1
9
8
9
Ja
n
-1
9
9
1
Ja
n
-1
9
9
5
Ja
n
-1
9
9
8
Ja
n
-1
9
9
0
Ja
n
-1
9
9
4
Ja
n
-1
9
9
7
Ja
n
-1
9
9
2
Ja
n
-1
9
9
6
Ja
n
-1
9
9
9
Ja
n
-2
0
0
0
Ja
n
-2
0
0
0
Ja
n
-2
0
0
3
Ja
n
-2
0
0
8
Ja
n
-2
0
1
5
Ja
n
-2
0
0
5
Ja
n
-2
0
1
2
Ja
n
-2
0
1
0
Ja
n
-2
0
1
7
Ja
n
-2
0
1
9
Ja
n
-2
0
0
1
Ja
n
-2
0
0
2
Ja
n
-2
0
0
7
Ja
n
-2
0
1
4
Ja
n
-2
0
0
4
Ja
n
-2
0
0
9
Ja
n
-2
0
1
6
Ja
n
-2
0
0
6
Ja
n
-2
0
1
3
Ja
n
-2
0
1
1
Ja
n
-2
0
1
8
Ja
n
-2
0
2
0
In
it
ia
l C
la
im
s,
S
ea
so
na
lly
A
dj
us
te
d
(0
0
0
s)
Source: U.S. Employment and Training Administration; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
5
When it finally became clear that the entire sub-prime lending industry was little more than a giant Ponzi scheme,
everything began to unwind. All those businesses that made billions of dollars during the bubble inflation suddenly
lost their ability to earn a profit. The crash ultimately caused the permanent loss of millions of jobs connected with the
bubble. Short of another bubble, these businesses/jobs were simply unsustainable. The crisis eventually caused the
worst downturn since the Great Depression and the U.S. economy didn’t fully recover until 2015.
What is happening today is nothing like what happened in 2008. The vast majority of people currently applying for
unemployment are being laid off from profitable, sustainable businesses that have been shuttered temporarily as a result
of public health mandates. If a cure for COVID-19 was discovered tomorrow, these mandates would be relaxed quickly,
and there is no reason to think that companies wouldn’t reopen again as viable businesses and bring their employees
back to work. What is happening today amounts to temporary layoffs—not permanent job losses.
The difference between now and then is apparent in the data. When a broad negative shock, such as a collapsing
subprime bubble, hits the economy, employment in a lagging indicator because businesses shut down and lay off
employees only as a last resort. The peak in initial claims for unemployment during the Great Recession occurred in
June 2009—the last official month of the recession. This time around the spike in unemployment has occurred first.
As opposed to job losses being the result of a shock to the system, in this case, they are themselves the shock to the
system. But this shock only lasts as long as the health mandates.
Of course, that should not imply that there are no serious effects. While the world waits for the Coronavirus to be
contained to the point where it is safe to lift the public health mandates, businesses are losing revenues and families
are losing income. This will cause them to fall behind on financial obligations, which can lead to other difficulties such as
bankruptcies, defaults, and business failures. Moreover, the lack of consumer and business spending is sending shock
waves through supply chains, leading to additional lost income and revenues, and more strain. As this continues, true
structural damage will begin to build within the economy—harm that in theory could slow an otherwise rapid return
to normalcy. How much damage will ultimately determine whether the economic trajectory looks like a sharp V or a
protracted U.
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
6
ORGANIZING OUR IGNORANCE
To try and tease out what is likely to transpire in the economy in 2020, there are five basic questions that help approximate
how much sustained damage will be generated from the public health related closures. If the answers suggest a lot of
harm—then a slow recovery will be in . If they don’t suggest sustained harm, then there is no reason to think the
economy won’t rapidly return to normal. When thinking through these questions, we do not necessarily arrive at the
conclusion that there will be an extended contraction of the economy.
1. How long until the public health mandates are lifted?
2. How deep is the current shock to the economy?
3. What is government doing in the meantime to soften the blow?
4. How fragile/healthy was the economy when the pandemic first hit?
5. Will there be permanent significant changes in consumer behavior?
As for the first question, the good news is that the number of new Coronavirus cases appears to have peaked in the
United States as well as in many other hard-hit nations. Some areas are already clamoring to lift certain mandates and
even places like California, which has been very cautious, is beginning to see some partial lifting of controls. ‘Hot spots’
may reemerge in certain locations, which will slow the process, but remember, we are not the same nation as we were
in February when we were given empty assurances from the Federal government and were blindly going about our lives
with little cognition of the outbreak that was already growing rapidly. This time, the reaction to new outbreaks will be fast
and fierce.
“A GOOD FORECASTER IS NOT SMARTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE, HE
MERELY HAS HIS IGNORANCE BETTER ORGANIZED.”
– ANONYMOUS
40000
20000
25000
5000
0
35000
15000
30000
10000
2
/2
5
/2
0
2
/2
9
/2
0
3
/6
/2
0
3
/1
2
/2
0
2
/2
7
/2
0
3
/4
/2
0
3
/1
0
/2
0
3
/2
/2
0
3
/8
/2
0
3
/1
4
/2
0
3
/1
6
/2
0
3
/2
0
/2
0
3
/2
4
/2
0
4
/3
/2
0
4
/1
7
/2
0
3
/2
8
/2
0
4
/1
1
/2
0
4
/7
/2
0
4
/2
1
/2
0
3
/1
8
/2
0
3
/2
2
/2
0
4
/1
/2
0
4
/1
5
/2
0
3
/2
6
/2
0
4
/5
/2
0
4
/1
9
/2
0
3
/3
0
/2
0
4
/1
3
/2
0
4
/9
/2
0
4
/2
3
/2
0
C
as
es
Source: New York Times Case Tracker; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
New Cases 7-Day Average
Number of COVID-19 Cases
February 16 to April 23
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
7
The best example is China, which is ahead of the rest of the world in both its post-shutdown surge and its control efforts.
If the United States follows roughly the same path, we can expect mandates to start lifting in earnest in late May. Things
won’t go back to normal immediately—either in terms of the mandates being universally relaxed or people returning to
public life—but the process should begin. Certain activities such as large music festivals and conferences may continue to
be prohibited but smaller scale activities should begin to resume. Data from China (again) suggest that production should
be back up and running in about three months while consumer spending will take about four months to return to normalcy.
Either way, mandate wise, expect things to return to normal (mostly) by the third quarter of this year.
How deep is the current shock? Many households and businesses are being denied income because of the public health
mandates. But those who aren’t losing income are being denied the ability to make desired purchases. This will likely lead
to a build-up in demand and financial savings that will give the economy a boost when it reopens. The depth of the current
shock will help us understand the balance between the first and second group.
At this point, we don’t know exactly how deep the current shutdown in economic activity is. The obvious issues are with
restaurants, hotels, airports, travel operations, and a large portion of retail. But these kinds of businesses don’t make up
that large of a share of U.S. GDP. In fact, the closures currently add up to less than 10% of U.S. economic activity in a typical
year. Of course, the shock expands as it works its way into supply chains. This takes time given the basics of inventory
pipelines. There are also productivity impacts as many people are forced to work from home, but again, we have little
ability to estimate how big of an impact.
U.S. GDP Contributions by Section
Gross domestic product
Retail trade
Accommodation and food services
Administrative and support services
Other services, except government
Arts, entertainment, and recreation
Oil and gas extraction
Air transportation
Petroleum and coal products
Finance, insurance, real estate
Government
Manufacturing
Professional, scientific
Health care
Information
Management
Value Added by Sector
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
2019 IV
21729
1190
675
627
464
239
208
152
146
4556
2667
2381
1679
1648
1137
425
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
8
Notably, we are fortunate to live in an era of connectivity where a large share of retail business has and is shifting to an
online environment. Many restaurants are offering take out and office meetings are being held over Zoom. All of these
changes will continue to expand and help mitigate some of the hits the economy is taking.
In total, we anticipate that the U.S. economy will contract by 7.5% to 10% in the second quarter, an annualized rate of 30%
to 40%. This is huge historically, but it also suggests the income hits suffered by this 10% of the economy will be offset by
pent up demand in the balance of the economy.
How about the government Intervention? There has been an unprecedented degree of public support for businesses
and workers who are being negatively impacted. Initial claims for unemployment are up so dramatically in part because
the eligibility has been widened to include many workers who would not have been eligible in 2008. Benefits have been
heavily expanded. In California they can be up to $1100 per week and there have even been anecdotes about employees
who prefer being laid off to working. Additionally, eligible households are getting $1200 per person and small businesses
are receiving forgivable loans to ensure they keep people employed. Billions of dollars more are going to social programs
and direct support for local governments, hospitals, transit, and other services.
The current tally comes $2 trillion plus in government stimulus, which is enormous. The entire U.S. economy is approximately
$22 trillion in size, meaning that on a quarterly basis overall economic activity runs about $5.5 trillion. As the predicted
declines are in the 10% range for the second quarter, that amounts to a half-a-trillion dollar decline, give or take. A $2
trillion stimulus package is four times the size of this calculated decline. Much of the stimulus will flow straight into the
financial markets which are currently in full swoon—but the remainder will significantly boost demand.
How healthy was the economy when the crisis began? There is little doubt that the pandemic is delivering a significant
negative shock to the supply chain. Even those industries not directly impacted by the health mandates are being disrupted
at some level. But will otherwise profitable businesses collapse into bankruptcy because of a two-month closure? Will
mortgages move into foreclosure due to a couple months of lost income? That all depends on the health of the economy
(made up of these businesses and individuals) when the pandemic started.
The positive news is that the economy is much less fragile now than it has been in the past. Structurally, a lot more of
today’s economy is in services where there is little of the kind of inventory buildup that can create lasting harm during a
crisis. Similarly, the United States is less dependent on global trade than other developed nations, implying that disruptions
in global trade and supply chains are likely to have a smaller impact.
Cyclically the nation is in good shape despite the length of the current expansion. While the recovery from the Great
Recession was long and slow, and overall growth remains slower than in past expansions, the fundamentals of the U.S
economy are fantastic. Pre-COVID-19, unemployment was at a 50-year low and in recent years labor shortages have been
a problem in much of the nation. Both commercial and residential construction have had moderate runs with little sign of
excess inventories. The pacesetter of consumer spending growth has been in travel, recreation, and restaurants. Business
investment has been moderate. In short, nothing appears to be out of balance or due for collapse.
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
9
2.5
12.0
0.5
2.0
1.0
6.0
4.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
10.0
1.5
8.0
Ja
n
-2
0
1
1
Ja
n
-0
0
Ja
n
-1
0
Ja
n
-0
5
Ja
n
-1
5
Ja
n
-2
0
1
3
Ja
n
-2
0
1
5
Ja
n
-2
0
1
7
Ja
n
-2
0
1
9
Ja
n
-2
0
1
2
Ju
l-
0
2
Ju
l-
1
2
Ju
l-
0
7
Ju
l-
1
7
Ja
n
-2
0
1
4
Ja
n
-2
0
1
6
Ja
n
-2
0
1
8
Ja
n
-2
0
2
0
M
ay
-2
0
1
1
N
o
v
-0
0
N
o
v
-1
0
N
o
v
-0
5
N
o
v
-1
5
M
ay
-2
0
1
3
M
ay
-2
0
1
5
M
ay
-2
0
1
7
M
ay
-2
0
1
9
M
ay
-2
0
1
2
M
ay
-0
3
M
ay
-1
3
M
ay
-0
8
M
ay
-1
8
M
ay
-2
0
1
4
M
ay
-2
0
1
6
M
ay
-2
0
1
8
S
e
p
-2
0
1
1
S
e
p
-0
1
S
e
p
-1
1
S
e
p
-0
6
S
e
p
-1
6
S
e
p
-2
0
1
3
S
e
p
-2
0
1
5
S
e
p
-2
0
1
7
S
e
p
-2
0
1
9
S
e
p
-2
0
1
2
M
a
r-
0
4
M
a
r-
1
4
M
a
r-
0
9
M
a
r-
1
9
S
e
p
-2
0
1
4
S
e
p
-2
0
1
6
S
e
p
-2
0
1
8
C
as
es
%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Unemployment Rate Job Openings Rate
Payroll Job Growth (Y-o-Y)
Unemployment and Job Openings (Rates)
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
10
12
19
18.5
17.5
16.5
15.5
14.5
4
15
2
6
16
0
14
10
18
8
17
Ja
n
-8
9
Ja
n
-1
9
8
0
Ja
n
-1
9
9
2
Ja
n
-1
9
8
6
Ja
n
-1
9
9
8
Ja
n
-1
9
8
3
Ja
n
-1
9
9
5
Ja
n
-1
9
8
9
Ja
n
-2
0
0
1
Ja
n
-2
0
0
4
Ja
n
-2
0
0
7
Ja
n
-2
0
1
0
Ja
n
-2
0
1
3
Ja
n
-2
0
1
6
Ja
n
-2
0
1
9
Ja
n
-9
3
Ja
n
-0
0
Ja
n
-0
7
Ja
n
-1
4
Ju
l-
8
9
F
e
b
-1
9
8
2
F
e
b
-1
9
9
4
F
e
b
-1
9
8
8
F
e
b
-2
0
0
0
F
e
b
-1
9
8
5
F
e
b
-1
9
9
7
F
e
b
-1
9
9
1
F
e
b
-2
0
0
3
F
e
b
-2
0
0
6
F
e
b
-2
0
0
9
F
e
b
-2
0
1
2
F
e
b
-2
0
1
5
F
e
b
-2
0
1
8
Ju
l-
9
6
Ju
l-
0
3
Ju
l-
1
0
Ju
l-
1
7
M
a
r-
8
7
A
p
r-
1
9
8
0
A
p
r-
1
9
9
2
A
p
r-
1
9
8
6
A
p
r-
1
9
9
8
A
p
r-
1
9
8
3
A
p
r-
1
9
9
5
A
p
r-
1
9
8
9
A
p
r-
2
0
0
1
A
p
r-
2
0
0
4
A
p
r-
2
0
0
7
A
p
r-
2
0
1
0
A
p
r-
2
0
1
3
A
p
r-
2
0
1
6
A
p
r-
2
0
1
9
M
a
r-
9
4
M
a
r-
0
1
M
a
r-
0
8
M
a
r-
1
5
S
e
p
-9
0
S
e
p
-9
7
S
e
p
-0
4
S
e
p
-1
1
S
e
p
-1
8
M
ay
-8
8
M
a
r-
1
9
8
1
M
a
r-
1
9
9
3
M
a
r-
1
9
8
7
M
a
r-
1
9
9
9
M
a
r-
1
9
8
4
M
a
r-
1
9
9
6
M
a
r-
1
9
9
0
M
a
r-
2
0
0
2
M
a
r-
2
0
0
5
M
a
r-
2
0
0
8
M
a
r-
2
0
1
1
M
a
r-
2
0
1
4
M
a
r-
2
0
1
7
M
ay
-9
5
M
ay
-0
2
M
ay
-0
9
M
ay
-1
6
N
o
v
-9
1
N
o
v
-9
8
N
o
v
-0
5
N
o
v
-1
3
N
o
v
-1
2
N
o
v
-1
9
%
%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
The financial economy, overall, is also healthy. Household savings rates are at a 30 year high, financial obligations ratios
are at record low levels, and consumer debt markets have very low delinquency rates. Debt burdens on U.S. households
are lower now than they were in 2007 at the peak of the bubble or even in more normal 1998. Real estate has a close to
record low debt-to-equity ratio and, thanks to changes in banking regulations following the Great Recession, borrowers
in the last decade have had a median credit score above 750, the highest ever.
Payroll Job Growth (Y-o-Y)
Financial Obligations as a % of DPI
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
11
All Families
Percentile Income
Less than 20
20–39.9
40–59.9
60–79.9
80–89.9
90–100
Family Characteristic
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Median Share 40% Plus
1998
17.9
18.6
17.5
19.4
19.5
17.8
13.7
1998
13.6
29.8
18.3
15.9
9.8
3.5
2.8
2007
18.7
19.1
17.1
20.3
21.9
19.3
12.5
2007
14.8
26.9
19.5
14.5
12.9
8.2
3.8
2016
14.7
11.9
15.6
14.4
16.1
16.3
11.3
2016
9.1
21.6
13.3
8.3
4.2
4.2
1.5
Ratio of Debt Payments to Family Income
Debt as Share of GDP (%)
Corporate debt as a share of U.S. GDP is at an all-time high level, but the ratio of corporate profits to GDP is also close
to record highs. And with such low interest rates, the aggregate debt burden on corporate America is actually quite
low. The banking sector has great leverage, has been lending conservatively, and is enjoying close to record low loan
delinquencies and losses. This is not a fragile economy.
350
50
100
200
150
0.0
300
250
%
Source: FRED/U.S. Office of Management and Budget; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Federal All Else
Ja
n
-1
9
6
6
Ja
n
-1
9
8
5
Ja
n
-2
0
0
4
M
a
r-
1
9
6
9
M
a
r-
1
9
8
8
M
a
r-
2
0
0
7
A
u
g
-1
9
6
7
A
u
g
-1
9
8
6
A
u
g
-2
0
0
5
O
ct
-1
9
7
0
O
ct
-1
9
8
9
O
ct
-2
0
0
8
M
ay
-1
9
7
2
M
ay
-1
9
9
1
M
ay
-2
0
1
0
D
e
c-
1
9
7
3
D
e
c-
1
9
9
2
D
e
c-
2
0
1
1
Ju
l-
1
9
7
5
Ju
l-
1
9
9
4
Ju
l-
2
0
1
3
F
e
b
-1
9
7
7
F
e
b
-1
9
9
6
F
e
b
-2
0
1
5
S
e
p
-1
9
7
8
S
e
p
-1
9
9
7
S
e
p
-2
0
1
6
A
p
r-
1
9
8
0
A
p
r-
1
9
9
9
A
p
r-
2
0
1
8
N
o
v
-1
9
8
1
N
o
v
-2
0
0
0
Ju
n
-1
9
8
3
Ju
n
-2
0
0
2
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
12
12
2
6
4
0
10
8
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Real Estate ConsumerC&I LoansAgricultural Loans
Q
1
-8
9
Q
1
-9
1
Q
1
-9
5
Q
1
-9
3
Q
1
-9
7
Q
1
-9
9
Q
1
-0
1
Q
1
-0
9
Q
1
-0
5
Q
1
-1
3
Q
1
-1
7
Q
1
-0
3
Q
1
-1
1
Q
1
-0
7
Q
1
-1
5
Q
1
-1
9
Commercial Bank Delinquencies
IT LOOKS LIKE A “V”
There is no doubt that the 10 million plus people who are entering into unemployment will face a challenging period
even with expanded unemployment benefits and direct payments from the Federal government. Many small businesses
are also being pushed close to the edge as they wait to restart operations. But among much of the consuming public,
savings rates are good, debt burdens are low, and consumers are maintaining their earnings. For this group the inability
to spend money during the public health mandated shutdowns will lead to a surge in savings and significant pent up
demand. While some households will not be able to spend as much post-pandemic, others will likely spend considerably
more than usual. The same applies to businesses and investors.
All this does not suggest a “U”, but a very large and rapid “V”. The second quarter will definitely post record negatives,
but that will be followed by record positives in the last half of the year as we quickly return to normalcy. We see GDP
growth as follows: 0% in Q1, -30% in Q2, 25% in Q3, and 5% in Q4, with unemployment falling back to the low 4’s over
the year. Not all of the damage will be erased, but much of it will and things should largely return to normal faster than
many expect. Indeed, we may find that the second quarter will be the only negative growth quarter of the year, which will
cause plenty of debate over whether this was or wasn’t a true recession.
E
C
O
N
O
M
Y
W
H
IT
E
P
A
P
E
R
S
E
R
IE
S
13
It is also worth discussing the chaos that overran the financial markets in recent weeks—led by the collapse in the equity
markets. The problems stemmed less from economic realities and more from financial improprieties. After the early 2019
sell off, the market exploded upwards and at the start of this year, P/E ratios were at 31—the third highest on record,
topped only in the years 2000 and 1929, according to Robert Shiller’s index. Maybe it will ultimately be a positive that
this bubble was popped before it began to do harm in the broader economy. But the recent wild swings in the numbers
cause havoc in short run debt markets and put substantial, unnecessary strain on an economy dealing with a very real
pandemic.
The Fed has now injected trillions of dollars into short term credit markets, but
it looks like much of the panic has already passed. Credit markets are settling down and the economy will, in the short
term at least, enjoy record low interest rates along with lower gas prices and all the other benefits that come from falling
commodity prices. This will also help with the third quarter bounce.
The larger question, however, is at what point will regulators finally begin to seriously address the excessive volatility of
the financial markets over the last decade? The markets are supposed to be the shock absorber for the U.S. economy,
but have turned into a shock expander.
While we believe that the most likely outcome for the U.S. economy is better than what most forecasts are currently
suggesting, we must also be humble in the face of such an unprecedented shock. In this case there are two major
wildcards. The first, of course, is the virus itself. They are wily things and can take strange and unanticipated twists and
turns. If the spread of the Coronavirus should spiral out of control again, public health mandates will once again take over
and more damage will be done. But even in such a case, public response should be faster and more forceful the second
time around, allowing us to weather the storm better. The global population has experienced a big learning curve and
we are likely to continue behaving vigilantly, which will help limit negative outcomes.
The second wildcard is whether there will be a dramatic shift in consumer behavior after the pandemic ends. Certainly,
people will wash their hands more often and handshakes may well become a thing of the past, but will consumers stop
going to ballgames and music festivals? Will they be too afraid to go to restaurants? We can’t really know, but it is worth
noting that for hundreds of years people have faced pandemics that were far deadlier and more frightening than this
one because they didn’t have the science or the medical responses we have today. Nevertheless, when there weren’t
pandemics, or they ended, people continued living active lives. Even during wartime, or in places that are under constant
threat of terrorist or other attack, people don’t allow low odds to halt their enjoyment of life. This is not a new normal—it
is a return to one that has been with us for a long time.
While we believe a “V” recovery is ahead, we say so very cautiously, and hope the false narrative that the ‘cure is worse
than the disease’ is not allowed to push us off our current path.
The UC …
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more